Proficiency Level Descriptors

Manchester Exam Proficiency Level Descriptors

B1 & B2 / CEFR & IELTS Alignment

B1 : Manchester Exam Scores 201–320 (CEFR B1 / IELTS 4.0–5.0):

At this intermediate (threshold) level, learners are independent users of English in familiar contexts. They possess enough vocabulary and basic grammar to “get by” in routine everyday situations. However, their range and precision are limited, so they rely heavily on practiced phrases and struggle with complex or unfamiliar material. CEFR notes that B1 students “have enough language to get by” on familiar topics, typically using short, high-frequency utterances and formulaic expressions. Their communicative competence is developing: they can maintain simple exchanges but must pause frequently and often resort to circumlocution (talking around unknown words) when precise language fails.

  • Listening (Receptive skill): B1 listeners understand the gist of clear, slowly delivered speech on everyday topics. They can catch the main points of conversations, announcements or broadcasts if the subject matter is familiar. In practice, comprehension becomes fragile as input length or complexity grows; learners often need slower pacing or repetitions. For example, CEFR descriptors emphasize that B1 learners can grasp “the main points of clear standard speech on familiar matters”, but rapid or idiomatic speech will usually exceed their processing abilities.
  • Reading (Receptive skill): B1 readers can interpret straightforward texts containing common, high-frequency vocabulary. They identify key information and overall meaning in personal letters, short news items or routine informational materials. Detail and nuance often elude them: they may miss implicit inferences or rare words. As CEFR notes, B1 readers “understand texts that consist mainly of high frequency everyday or job-related language”. Extended academic or abstract texts are challenging; learners rely on context and may skip difficult passages when reading.
  • Speaking (Interactive and productive skills): In face-to-face interaction, B1 speakers handle routine exchanges but with noticeable hesitation and repetition. They can manage common tasks (e.g. asking for directions, making reservations) and initiate or sustain simple conversations on familiar subjects. They describe experiences and plans in basic terms and give short reasons or explanations, using simple linking words (e.g. and, then, because). Speech is generally intelligible, though errors in grammar and word choice are frequent. Strategic competence is evident: when a needed word is unknown, learners often use synonyms, gestures or formulaic chunks to convey meaning. As the CEFR table observes, B1 users speak “with some hesitation and circumlocutions” and maintain coherence by linking short elements. Discourse is essentially a series of simple statements rather than extended, complex monologues.
  • Writing (Productive skill): B1-level writing produces brief connected texts on familiar topics. Learners can write simple descriptions of events or personal experiences and short personal letters. Sentences are mostly basic (simple and compound), and ideas are linked with elementary cohesive devices (and, but, because). Coherence is limited: they can “link a series of shorter, discrete simple elements into a connected, linear sequence of points”, but advanced organization and rich vocabulary are lacking. Grammatical control is emerging; common structures (present/past tenses, simple conditionals) are used with some correctness, but complex forms cause errors. Spelling and punctuation may be inconsistent. In sum, B1 writing conveys intended meaning despite restricted accuracy and cohesion.
  • Grammar/Lexical Accuracy: Grammar control at B1 covers core sentence patterns (e.g. present/past/future simple tenses; common modal verbs; basic comparative forms). Learners often use familiar routines and set phrases accurately, but their attempts at complex grammar (subordinate clauses, passive voice) typically yield mistakes. Vocabulary (lexical resource) is adequate for everyday needs but narrow; topics outside routine contexts trigger long pauses or substitutions. Errors are systematic but do not entirely prevent understanding: CEFR notes that B1 users can “keep going comprehensibly” despite frequent pauses for grammatical and lexical planning and repair.
  • Overall Comprehension: At B1, comprehension is primarily literal. Learners easily grasp explicit facts and main ideas when context is known. They identify the gist of dialogues or texts and follow straightforward arguments. However, implicit meaning and subtle shades of nuance are often missed. For instance, they may not understand idiomatic expressions or detect sarcasm. CEFR descriptors imply this limitation: B1 learners follow basic arguments and narratives but “cannot usually pick out subtleties or implied attitudes” without support. In essence, they rely on context and clear signal words to interpret messages.

B2 : Manchester Exam Scores 321–400 (CEFR B2 / IELTS 5.5–6.5):

At this upper-intermediate (vantage) level, learners have become more independent and effective communicators. They tackle a wider range of academic and social situations with confidence. CEFR characterizes B2 users as having “a sufficient range of language to give clear descriptions [and] express viewpoints on most general topics”. They display a relatively high degree of grammatical accuracy, and their communication is largely fluent. Complexity is higher: B2 learners use subordinate clauses and a variety of idioms, and they can adjust style somewhat for different contexts, though not always perfectly.

  • Listening: B2 listeners understand extended speech and lectures on familiar subjects. They can follow complex lines of argument in discussions and media, provided the context and accent are known. As CEFR states, B2 learners “can understand extended speech and lectures and follow even complex lines of argument” if the topic is reasonably familiar. They readily comprehend news reports and programmes on current affairs. Occasional gaps remain: very rapid or highly idiomatic speech may still require concentrated effort or repetition. In general, comprehension at B2 is strong for both explicit information and implied speaker intentions.
  • Reading: B2 readers tackle concrete and abstract texts, including news articles, reports and some literary or technical passages. They can identify the author’s arguments and implicit viewpoints. For example, descriptors note that B2 learners “read articles and reports concerned with contemporary problems in which the writers adopt particular attitudes or viewpoints”. They infer implicit meaning and can handle most idiomatic language in context. However, highly specialized or unusually complex texts (e.g. academic journal articles) may still pose comprehension challenges and often require more time or reference tools.
  • Speaking: B2 speakers communicate with relative fluency and spontaneity. They participate actively in discussions on familiar and some abstract topics, presenting clear, reasoned opinions. Discourse is well organized: speakers use a variety of linking devices (although/ however, therefore, etc.) and a broader vocabulary to express ideas precisely. Hesitations occur mainly when encountering very new or technical vocabulary, but these rarely impede communication. As CEFR notes, B2 users “interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible” and can sustain viewpoints in conversation. In short, their communicative competence is well developed: linguistic and pragmatic skills combine so that they can narrate, explain, and debate with confidence.
  • Writing: B2 writers produce clear, detailed texts on diverse subjects. Essays and reports are structured into paragraphs with coherent argumentation. Learners effectively use complex grammatical forms (subordinate clauses, passives, conditionals) and a wide range of vocabulary to articulate fine distinctions. For example, they can compose essays “giving reasons in support of or against a particular point of view”. Cohesion is achieved through varied connectors and cohesive markers, leading to writing that is largely smooth and coherent. Errors may still appear (especially in less familiar structures), but they are uncommon and seldom obscure meaning.
  • Grammar/Lexical Accuracy: At B2, learners command most grammatical structures with good accuracy. The CEFR table underscores that B2 users make “few errors which cause misunderstanding” and maintain a relatively even tempo of speech. They use complex sentence forms routinely and possess a broad lexical resource, including idiomatic and colloquial expressions. Occasional systematic errors linger (e.g. in highly elaborate constructions), but these do not significantly hinder communication. Overall, B2 performance reflects a balance of fluency and accuracy: speakers and writers can express nuanced ideas clearly without needing to sacrifice one dimension for the other.
  • Overall Comprehension: B2 learners readily grasp explicit content and are increasingly adept at inferring implicit meaning. They can synthesize information from different parts of a lecture or text to understand the full argument. Subtle implications, humour, and attitude are often understood. Nevertheless, the most subtle cultural references or highly abstract nuances may still be missed on first encounter. In line with CEFR, B2 users can follow “complex lines of argument” and comprehend writers’ stances, indicating strong overall comprehension, both explicit and implicit.

Sources: Descriptions are based on CEFR-aligned testing literature and language learning research.